[pmmail-list] AKMAIL - ?????
Sven Schumacher
pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
Mon, 04 Jun 2001 18:21:21 +0200
--===-==--=-==-=--======--==--=--====-=-==-==---==
From: "Sven Schumacher" <sven_schumacher@gmx.de>
To: "pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com" <pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 18:21:21 +0200
Reply-To: "Sven Schumacher" <sven@die-schumachers.de>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2360) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_=_=_=IMA.BOUNDARY.HTML_4998384=_=_=_"
Subject: Re: [pmmail-list] AKMAIL - ?????
--_=_=_=IMA.BOUNDARY.HTML_4998384=_=_=_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:54:05 +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:03:07 +0200, Sven Schumacher wrote:
>>1. AKMAIL can optionaly make use of Internetexplorer to
>>view HTML-Mails. PMMAIL can't show all html-mailcontent.
>
>If PMMail is going to use Internet Explorer to display
>HTML mail, we will soon have the same problems than the
>Outlook users already have (security holes because of
>VB script etc.). A few days ago Jimmy wrote something
>about a new editor for PMMail that really looks good.
might be, but They CAN look at all the mails they get. I can't!!!
>>So BPS: AKMAIL wich is IMHO a clone of PMMAIL is on the
>>way to get better than PMMAIL.
>
>Is it really a clone? I always thought that it was something
>completely different (an indicator for that might be that it
>only runs on Windows). And IMO there has not been that much
>developement on AKMail for the last year(s) ;-).
Just have a look on it. I was surprised how similar it looks. The very most features are equivalent. Some features are even better (SMTP-Options, Error-Log...) Ok, they have maked some small differences, but they
could be brothers :-)
regards Sven
--_=_=_=IMA.BOUNDARY.HTML_4998384=_=_=_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
<FONT FACE="MS Sans Serif" DEFAULT="FACE"><FONT SIZE="1" POINTSIZE="8" DEFAULT="SIZE">On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:54:05 +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:<BR>
<BR>
>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:03:07 +0200, Sven Schumacher wrote:<BR>
<BR>
>>1. AKMAIL can <FONT COLOR=ff0000>optionaly<FONT COLOR=000000 DEFAULT="COLOR"> make use of Internetexplorer to<BR>
>>view HTML-Mails. PMMAIL can't show all html-mailcontent.<BR>
><BR>
>If PMMail is going to use Internet Explorer to display<BR>
>HTML mail, we will soon have the same problems than the<BR>
>Outlook users already have (security holes because of<BR>
>VB script etc.). A few days ago Jimmy wrote something<BR>
>about a new editor for PMMail that really looks good.<BR>
<BR>
might be, but They CAN look at all the mails they get. I can't!!!<BR>
<BR>
>>So BPS: AKMAIL wich is IMHO a clone of PMMAIL is on the<BR>
>>way to get better than PMMAIL.<BR>
><BR>
>Is it really a clone? I always thought that it was something<BR>
>completely different (an indicator for that might be that it<BR>
>only runs on Windows). And IMO there has not been that much<BR>
>developement on AKMail for the last year(s) ;-).<BR>
<BR>
Just have a look on it. I was surprised how similar it looks. The very most features are equivalent. Some features are even better (SMTP-Options, Error-Log...) Ok, they have maked some small differences, but they <BR>
could be brothers :-)<BR>
<BR>
regards Sven<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</HTML>
--_=_=_=IMA.BOUNDARY.HTML_4998384=_=_=_--
--===-==--=-==-=--======--==--=--====-=-==-==---==
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies.
iQA/AwUBOxuncoeM5oYqSznoEQKddQCggZtX9mmu3MYRMpBZPkEMTLUoNkQAoOVg
L2WNNSurK/p8MOvcevUCVfH0
=nATL
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
--===-==--=-==-=--======--==--=--====-=-==-==---==--