From krevet at sbcglobal.net Thu May 17 04:25:24 2007 From: krevet at sbcglobal.net (Bernhard Krevet) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:25:24 -0400 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? Thanks. Excerpt: Dear AT&T Yahoo! Member, We're making some security improvements to your AT&T Yahoo! service. These changes will affect members who send or receive email from a desktop or mobile client program, such as Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Outlook Express, Eudora, Apple Mail, or Thunderbird. [...] To help us ensure the security of your email, you will need to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program. Alternatively, you may take the following steps to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program: Open your email client program. Locate the email account settings for your particular client. Change the POP server to pop.att.yahoo.com. Change the SMTP server to smtp.att.yahoo.com. Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the SMTP port to 465. Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the POP3 port to 995. Confirm the above settings then click OK. [\...] From mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com Thu May 17 04:34:19 2007 From: mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com (Michael Lueck) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:34:19 -0400 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <464BBF2B.30208@lueckdatasystems.com> Bernhard Krevet wrote: > ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? I finally gave up PMMail 2000 and used the migration Perl scripts posted years ago to migrate to ThunderBird even before v2 went stable. Yes, I still rather miss PMMail. TBird's message search stinks compared to PMMail. The folder compact / reindex functions are no where near robust enough. But, I now can send/receive via TLS encryption! (One better than SSL.) And HTML messages no longer cause trouble. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ From the1craig at chartermi.net Thu May 17 04:38:34 2007 From: the1craig at chartermi.net (Craig Bowman) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:38:34 -0400 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <464BC02A.90507@chartermi.net> My bet would be PMMail 2050 Craig Bowman Bernhard Krevet wrote: > Hi > ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? > Thanks. > > > Excerpt: > Dear AT&T Yahoo! Member, > > We're making some security improvements to your AT&T Yahoo! service. These changes will affect members who send or receive email from a desktop or mobile client program, such as Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Outlook Express, Eudora, Apple Mail, or Thunderbird. [...] > > To help us ensure the security of your email, you will need to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program. Alternatively, you may take the following steps to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program: Open your email client program. > Locate the email account settings for your particular client. > Change the POP server to pop.att.yahoo.com. > Change the SMTP server to smtp.att.yahoo.com. > Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the SMTP port to 465. > Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the POP3 port to 995. > Confirm the above settings then click OK. > [\...] > > > > From jimoe at sohnen-moe.com Thu May 17 08:57:52 2007 From: jimoe at sohnen-moe.com (James Moe) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:57:52 -0700 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <464BFCF0.6050801@sohnen-moe.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Krevet wrote: > Hi > ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? > Yes. (If you mean PMMail for os/2. PMMail2000 is the Windows version.) It isn't in the first beta but it will be by the General release. - -- jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (OS/2) iD8DBQFGS/zwzTcr8Prq0ZMRApfNAKCvmQ9t7F3sPysNP8Gmcs18Vo4RCgCcDgWS +QoaVj4vRQ5G/euUvsRwvhc= =GXTW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bxstover at yahoo.co.uk Thu May 17 08:57:20 2007 From: bxstover at yahoo.co.uk (Ben Stover) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:57:20 +0200 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel Message-ID: Hello Bernhard, Since 2 years I am using stunnel for SSL connections. Works perfect without problems and consums less ressources. stunnel is available for free from this page: http://www.stunnel.org/ You should install it as service in background. Then modify the configuration file stunnel.conf (here for GMail): [pop3s] accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 connect = pop.gmail.com:995 [smtps] accept = 127.0.0.1:259 connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 ... The lines above mean: listen on local port 1109 for POP3 requests from PMMail and forward them over SSL to POP3 Mail Server pop.gmail-com:995 Finally in PMMail enter in the receive settings: POP server: 127.0.0.1 Port: 1109 That's it. SMTP works similarly If you have further questions drop me an email Ben On Wed, 16 May 2007 22:25:24 -0400, Bernhard Krevet wrote: >Hi >ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? >Thanks. >Excerpt: >Dear AT&T Yahoo! Member, >We're making some security improvements to your AT&T Yahoo! service. These changes will affect members who send or receive email from a desktop or mobile client program, such as Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Outlook Express, Eudora, Apple Mail, or Thunderbird. [...] >To help us ensure the security of your email, you will need to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program. Alternatively, you may take the following steps to change the settings on your desktop or mobile email client program: Open your email client program. >Locate the email account settings for your particular client. >Change the POP server to pop.att.yahoo.com. >Change the SMTP server to smtp.att.yahoo.com. >Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the SMTP port to 465. >Check the option labeled Use an encrypted connection (SSL) and change the POP3 port to 995. >Confirm the above settings then click OK. >[\...] From jimoe at sohnen-moe.com Thu May 17 19:29:29 2007 From: jimoe at sohnen-moe.com (James Moe) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:29 -0700 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <464C90F9.3070903@sohnen-moe.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ben Stover wrote: > > Since 2 years I am using stunnel for SSL connections. Works perfect without problems and consums less ressources. > stunnel is available for free from this page: > > http://www.stunnel.org/ > > [pop3s] > accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 > connect = pop.gmail.com:995 > > [smtps] > accept = 127.0.0.1:259 > connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 > What if there is more than one account, i.e., multiple POP servers requiring SSL? - -- jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (OS/2) iD8DBQFGTJD5zTcr8Prq0ZMRAmESAJ9S6Ls9CVITVnxKeIjsGnDLJXteEgCfY2fD BCyOtT28ZG5rnGIXbsKGAAI= =/iKe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From andrea at modelberg.it Thu May 17 20:00:41 2007 From: andrea at modelberg.it (Andrea Vavassori) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:00:41 +0200 Subject: [pmmail-list] Address Book Message-ID: Hello to everyone! Just back from a massive crash that wiped off the partition table of my computer. I use Windows 2000 and Pmmail2000 2.20.2717. After reinstalling a plain vanilla version (over a new Win2000 installation on a different hard disk) I recovered the whole original installation directory and copied it directly on top of the freshly made installation. Everything went perfectly i.e. I now have again the same registration, accounts, scripts, filters etc. with the exception of the address book. Can anyone tell me what are its files and where they are placed? Kind Regards, /\ \ / /--\ndrea \/avassori Modelberg S.N.C. http://www.modelberg.com ________________________________________________________________ Virus and Spam checked by NSS Srl - http://www.nssitaly.com Compliant to DL #196 30/06/2003 Definition count: 306580 Definition date: 2007/05/17 MDAV version: 2.2.9 From mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com Thu May 17 20:05:19 2007 From: mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com (Michael Lueck) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:05:19 -0400 Subject: [pmmail-list] Address Book In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <464C995F.2070106@lueckdatasystems.com> Andrea Vavassori wrote: > Can anyone tell me what are its files and where they are > placed? Assuming that PMMail is installed to x:\email\pmmail then the address book would be located at x:\email\tools -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ From andrea at modelberg.it Thu May 17 20:11:51 2007 From: andrea at modelberg.it (Andrea Vavassori) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:11:51 +0200 Subject: [pmmail-list] Address Book In-Reply-To: <464C995F.2070106@lueckdatasystems.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:05:19 -0400, Michael Lueck wrote: >Andrea Vavassori wrote: >> Can anyone tell me what are its files and where they are >> placed? > >Assuming that PMMail is installed to x:\email\pmmail then the address book would be located at x:\email\tools GREAT! Thanks a lot, you are spot on, in fact that directory has not been recovered. Kind Regards, /\ \ / /--\ndrea \/avassori Modelberg S.N.C. http://www.modelberg.com ________________________________________________________________ Virus and Spam checked by NSS Srl - http://www.nssitaly.com Compliant to DL #196 30/06/2003 Definition count: 306580 Definition date: 2007/05/17 MDAV version: 2.2.9 From Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net Thu May 17 22:30:56 2007 From: Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net (Robert Dahlem) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:30:56 +0200 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel In-Reply-To: <464C90F9.3070903@sohnen-moe.com> References: <464C90F9.3070903@sohnen-moe.com> Message-ID: <464CBB80.2070707@gmx.net> James, On 17.05.2007 19:29, James Moe wrote: >> Since 2 years I am using stunnel for SSL connections. Works perfect without problems and consums less ressources. >> stunnel is available for free from this page: >> [pop3s] >> accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 >> connect = pop.gmail.com:995 >> [smtps] >> accept = 127.0.0.1:259 >> connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 > What if there is more than one account, i.e., multiple POP servers > requiring SSL? Not the slightest problem. You just add ports to the configuration and point PMM to them: [pop3s] accept = 127.0.0.1:1110 connect = pop.otherprovider.com:995 [smtps] accept = 127.0.0.1:260 connect = smtp.otherprovider.com:465 Regards, Robert From williuamott at aratus.com Fri May 18 17:12:54 2007 From: williuamott at aratus.com (williuam ott) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:12:54 +0100 Subject: Hot stock report Message-ID: <200705181640.l4IGeUW2025932@mail2.bawue.de> In the other MSMQ API Test open the queue for Receive. http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/6935/4uct4.png Investors report. From SJobergqkm at anyplay.com Sat May 19 18:28:09 2007 From: SJobergqkm at anyplay.com (Nello SJoberg) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:28:09 +0200 Subject: Frankfurt symbol tip! Message-ID: <200705191616.l4JGGXtw017774@mail2.bawue.de> German markets alert. http://img294.imageshack.us/my.php?image=feujxg2.png WinVTP will prompt you for the location where it should place the downloaded file - you can even give it a new name. From garriqVillapando at airworthyinc.net Sun May 20 19:31:30 2007 From: garriqVillapando at airworthyinc.net (garriq Villapando) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:31:30 +0200 Subject: Watch trade Message-ID: <649954431331.033385314850@airworthyinc.net> http://img404.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eudk4.gif Terrific gains possible! Sets the font attributes. Comets and asteroids labels on the map now include magnitude. From Eppensteinpkssm at ERF.HR Wed May 23 12:48:54 2007 From: Eppensteinpkssm at ERF.HR (Sandi Eppenstein) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:48:54 +0200 Subject: Investors report Message-ID: <200705231049.l4NAn5bn026395@mail2.bawue.de> Figure 2-11 Location of subterranean structure. http://img71.imageshack.us/my.php?image=so1jta7.jpg unternehmen From mikSam at SPRINGENG.com Wed May 23 13:46:36 2007 From: mikSam at SPRINGENG.com (mik Sam) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:46:36 -0000 Subject: Watch trade. Message-ID: <000601c75733$46c78d20$632547d4@AHMEDALRAWAGHAH> If - (Q) is zero, the value +0 is returned if is positive, or -0 if is negative. http://img404.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vzxmsz1.png Opening bell message! From iuliana at audi-sever.ru Wed May 23 08:35:28 2007 From: iuliana at audi-sever.ru (iuliana Fox) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:35:28 +0100 Subject: Hot symbol tip Message-ID: <200705231253.l4NCqsJn026949@mail2.bawue.de> Schlussabrechnungpreis! http://img404.imageshack.us/my.php?image=7stzdp8.jpg If you do, it will break the build. From Jiri172 at apagina.com.br Wed May 23 18:43:26 2007 From: Jiri172 at apagina.com.br (Jiri carrico) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:43:26 +0200 Subject: Very hot peport Message-ID: Add to your radar http://img46.imageshack.us/my.php?image=solwaiz7.png Marla steps down hard on Jack's foot. From maribeth.khalif at arsengs.com Wed May 23 13:39:12 2007 From: maribeth.khalif at arsengs.com (maribeth khalif) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:39:12 +05-30 Subject: Hot, news. Message-ID: <4AF2CACB.C75A9485@arsengs.com> http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7693/zvxrbnmj7.gif For investors. Still they might like. Who isn't interested in his hardware will have no need to become interested for if you ever have to know something about it, ask Dr. From hazelwoodmjgv at alumni.nanopump.org Wed May 23 16:35:07 2007 From: hazelwoodmjgv at alumni.nanopump.org (Lahjat hazelwood) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:35:07 +0200 Subject: wettwerb Message-ID: <0E8FC40E.99B5A77C@alumni.nanopump.org> http://img452.imageshack.us/img452/3087/fvxzrnn8.jpg Zinsertrag! What would you think. Der Schnellzug rast und will nicht rasten. From HampusTaege at kupon-nyhederne.dk Sat May 26 04:04:45 2007 From: HampusTaege at kupon-nyhederne.dk (Hampus Taege) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:04:45 +0800 Subject: Hot news Message-ID: <000b01c79f3a$3b1f6020$b718a1de@nenudb44181bb6> Aber sie antwortete ihm nicht. Habe ich von ihm gelernt. Deinen bleiben, zu dir hat er seine Zuflucht genommen. http://img381.imageshack.us/my.php?image=zyxxqsyos2.png Konkurrenz? From krevet at sbcglobal.net Mon May 28 00:56:01 2007 From: krevet at sbcglobal.net (Bernhard Krevet) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:56:01 -0700 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel In-Reply-To: <200705170659.l4H6xvXu024434@nlpi022.sbcis.sbc.com> Message-ID: Hi Ben, hi Robert: thanks very much for the advice, I now downloaded & installed stunnel. Works great after some stumbling on my part with the stunnel.conf (comment out the [imap] lines, and the cert = stunnel.pem line) Also no problem with multiple pop and smtp servers. One curiosity: After a send with GMail, it does the send, waits for server acceptance, then immediately shows "ERROR: Check error log" where I see: "Sun, 27 May 07 15:40:01 ==> Error ; Server broke connection". All seems to go fine, so what might cause the erroneous error message? No such message with ATT's server... Thanks again Bernhard. On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:57:20 +0200, Ben Stover wrote: >Hello Bernhard, > >Since 2 years I am using stunnel for SSL connections. Works perfect without problems and consums less ressources. >stunnel is available for free from this page: > >http://www.stunnel.org/ > >You should install it as service in background. > >Then modify the configuration file stunnel.conf (here for GMail): > >[pop3s] >accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 >connect = pop.gmail.com:995 > >[smtps] >accept = 127.0.0.1:259 >connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 > >... > >The lines above mean: >listen on local port 1109 for POP3 requests from PMMail and forward them over SSL to POP3 Mail Server pop.gmail-com:995 > >Finally in PMMail enter in the receive settings: > >POP server: 127.0.0.1 >Port: 1109 > >That's it. >SMTP works similarly > >If you have further questions drop me an email > >Ben > > > >On Wed, 16 May 2007 22:25:24 -0400, Bernhard Krevet wrote: > >>Hi >>ATT will require SSL in the near future. When can we expect SSL support in PMMail 2000? >>Thanks. > > From Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net Mon May 28 09:24:13 2007 From: Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net (Robert Dahlem) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:24:13 +0200 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <465A839D.8030606@gmx.net> Hi, On 28.05.2007 00:56, Bernhard Krevet wrote: [stunnel] > One curiosity: After a send with GMail, it does the send, waits for > server acceptance, then immediately shows "ERROR: Check error log" > where I see: "Sun, 27 May 07 15:40:01 ==> Error ; Server broke > connection". All seems to go fine, so what might cause the erroneous > error message? No such message with ATT's server... Sorry, can't tell. My stunnel.conf for GMail was this one: ========================================================= debug = debug client = yes [gmailpop] accept = 127.0.0.1:123 connect = pop.gmail.com:995 [gmailsmtp] accept = 127.0.0.1:124 connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 ========================================================= Out of the blue: you might try "Send after fetch". Regards, Robert From jrace at attglobal.net Mon May 28 15:22:46 2007 From: jrace at attglobal.net (jrace at attglobal.net) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:22:46 -0400 Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel Message-ID: <380-220075128132246521@M2W008.mail2web.com> some mail servers break down the connection during the data phase if the message starts to look spammy e.g. no subject, illegal subject, obscene language (the 7 naughty words) Original Message: ----------------- From: Robert Dahlem Robert.Dahlem at gmx.net Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:24:13 +0200 To: pmmail-list at blueprintsoftwareworks.com Subject: [pmmail-list] ATT requires SSL Solution=stunnel Hi, On 28.05.2007 00:56, Bernhard Krevet wrote: [stunnel] > One curiosity: After a send with GMail, it does the send, waits for > server acceptance, then immediately shows "ERROR: Check error log" > where I see: "Sun, 27 May 07 15:40:01 ==> Error ; Server broke > connection". All seems to go fine, so what might cause the erroneous > error message? No such message with ATT's server... Sorry, can't tell. My stunnel.conf for GMail was this one: ========================================================= debug = debug client = yes [gmailpop] accept = 127.0.0.1:123 connect = pop.gmail.com:995 [gmailsmtp] accept = 127.0.0.1:124 connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 ========================================================= Out of the blue: you might try "Send after fetch". Regards, Robert -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com - Microsoft? Exchange solutions from a leading provider - http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange