PGP signatures

[Steve Lamb]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:25:35 -0400, Bob Lockie wrote:

>I personally don't think anything but some business corespondance needs to be
>signed.

    Signing messages wholesale serves a purpose, it makes signing, and later,
encrypting, the norm instead of the exception.

    I don't know about you, but personally, all written corrispondance I
have, business or not, get's my signature.  This is no different.


- --
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQCVAwUBNx+P2aC6xbtZwvdnAQGmLwQApJyakmDglg+V/UqztMg6mBDT7wBNyI+7
nqU5/9unr6kAD217mb7zjo+OKZdgrrtLtPeoskL7Q6PL7666ucXDLnShDZDNxru4
x+eoHiA5wHE30i6JDsIjhjhgh4NWnMUhoNSubKj1sEW3oGnvLT+U3uW+xCMAbVCB
/YGq4+RFaL0=
=tWq3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----