PGP signatures

[Bill McCarthy]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 01:03:26 +0300, Cristian Secara wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 17:45:58 -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
>
>>Huh?  I can't parse that.  Are you saying that the list server
>>damages the sig?  If so, not here -- messages that are signed on
>>this list, and for which I have the public key, show up with the
>>pgp key stripped and verification on the status line.
>
>All messages from Steve Lamb are signed ok ?
>Here not. See my previous message, five minutes ago ...
>
>(testing my sig with this message)

I just asked for and immediately received Steve's key.  After adding it
to my PMM PGP keyring, I could verify Steve's email to me.  However I
could not verify any of his messages to this list.  I noticed that Steve
is not using a standard 2.6.2 key.  Perhaps some of these "improvements"
to PGP are not so good.  My trusty 2.6.2 keys (using RSA) work with
everything I've used such as PMMail, remailers, nym reply blocks, Jack B
Nymble, etc.

I hope OpenPGP will be released soon.

Regards,

Bill

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQEVAwUBNx/IGM9PG92Op+yRAQFSVgf/YMRr4O8UToUygZWh69ff1za7NDgR5lKC
9eEaV/NdT5xb3nB7pan76IFzbscTMLdVEk853Zz5MrTSpNUd23z5UbAE1XfDQyI1
GElay6zztjEMpvL67ohgZW+iEFn8jIeuQByuBQtbECtwybeWyLc7YEC7Z+8Zqtcn
nwCPyS/KBfXe+QJyzT/+DZYjyOfVNR3mlyxkImNZEPYav6YwznLrtNKoZDK2Kg+n
DwaOc0iGl1dRt1gNjvnttFbEXR3lfmUV/LECPMxJxmAQaluqM8uVSfqQ7CS7WFz9
m9h569CD0FE3dz1kALsxPRE3x2yT3FPXueIUlYNXaOvyt7QL7ct3wQ==
=A5Ac
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----