PGP signatures

[Paul Wiener]

On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 19:29:05 +0300, Cristian Secara wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 04:38:22 -0700, Paul Wiener wrote:
>
>>Perhaps all PGP users should stop signing their routine messages, but should
>>encrypt them instead. That would eliminate the extra consumption of bandwidth
>>and those unsightly PGP signatures at the bottoms of the messages.
>
>Letting aside the aberration, you seem to ignore that a (PGP) encrypted
>message is much longer than the same message, but not encrypted.

John's already addressed the message-length issue, but, uh, what do you mean
by, "letting aside the aberration?" Would PGP encryption cause the message to
be blurred?

--
___________
Paul Wiener

paulish@paulish.com
got_the_T-shirt@been-there.com
paulish@cyberjunkie.com
paulish@planetarymotion.net
paulish@thepentagon.com
paulish@usa.net
tinea-pedis@bigfoot.com
KJ6AV@callsign.net
pw@i.am
--------------------------------------------------------