PMmail trap.
Wilson Rook
pmmail@rpglink.com
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:55:41 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:38:54 +0000 (GMT), Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:52:10, Brian Morrison wrote:
>
>>Be very careful with wru8610, or indeed wr08610. This is a fix that
>>installs a 32 bit stack, I have found it to be unreliable in some
>>circumstances. In addition, if you remove it, things get left behind
>>that can cause Java 1.1.7 and later to cause a ring 0 trap.
>>
>>I have stayed with the wr08424 update, after applying wr08423. This is
>>OK, at least for me. Of course, YMMV.
>
>I've also been there, done that, regretted it, and gone back to 8424
>which is perfectly stable.
>
>
If you look at some of the Fixpak readme's, It was my understanding that,
while not required, It may be best to install wr08600 prior to installing
wr08610 or wr08620. Wr08600 is the TCPIP 4.1 upgrade.
When I have used wr08610 on the 4.0 stack I have also had problems. I now
have the Software Choice 4.1 stack and have loaded WR08620. My Bind
server stoped working - reloading did not help. Deleted Bind and restarted
and now it works fine. I'll find out more about the longer term stability over the
next few months.
wrook@walkabout.org