Colored Backgrounds

[Wilson Rook]

On Sun, 12 Dec 1999 20:32:34 +0100 (MEZ), Alexander Sarras wrote:

>On Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:15:10 -0500 (EST), Wilson Rook wrote:
>
>> As an option over an attachment, I would prefer an html email.  I don't have Office 
and it 
>> is a pain to open Star Office only to find the attachment to be one of the few that can't 
be 
>> read.   
>> 
>Which one is that?
>SaS
Which attachment -- Once in a while I'll receive a Word attachment that can not 
be read by Star Office.  It may be a result of how the file was attached, or some other
error.  

The point I was intending is that it would be easier - even if only by a little bit to 
have the message in html over an attachment.  

Of course a spreadsheet would be of much less value as html vs. an attachment.

I think e-mail should be kept simple. If ascii will work us it.  If simple html is needed,
that also is good.  If it takes more than that - it should not be an email.

Wilson
>-- 
>  Alexander.Sarras@ap.univie.ac.at  |     * Trouble * IS my middle name!
>                                    |           The TroubleShooter
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>