Colored Backgrounds

[Bill Wood]

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:20:08, David Gaskill wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 01:35:12 -0400 (AST), Trevor Smith wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 12 Dec 1999 16:12:55, David Gaskill wrote:
>>
>>>I have enough on my plate without worrying about the Internet as a whole. 
>>>When I switch another light on I do not worry about whether the generating 
>>>company has sufficient capacity to supply this increased demand. 
>>
>>This is exactly the attitude that we are arguing to change. You and
>>others (probably most others) do not believe there is any reason to
>>worry about where the electricity comes from. It will just always be
>>there, right?
>
>The company that supplies my  electricity frequently sends me circulars urging 
>me to buy appliances which will use more of the stuff. However this is not 
>probably a good parallel with Internet bandwidth even though I suggested it in 
>the first place.

Actually it is a good analogy, as would be anything
that is market driven. 
>
>It is suggested that if I use more electricity more fossil fuel will be burnt and the 
>planet will get warmer.

Global warming? You're kidding?  
>
>I don't suppose an increase in Internet bandwidth well have much effect on the 
>climate and the materials necessary to manufacture servers and optical fibre are 
>not about to become exhausted.
>>
>>I and a few others (probably very few others) feel it is important to
>>wonder where the electricity comes from. It's the first step in
>>making sure that there will always be more. The second step is
>>acknowledging that it's not unlimited and attempting to use what we
>>have efficiently.
>>
>It seems to me that the amount of Internet bandwidth we can have is essentially 
>limited only by the willingness to fund it and its provision has no ecological 
>impact.  

The willingness to fund is a response to market needs.
This isn't rocket science.

>Relatively few of those that have invested in Internet related businesses are 
>making any money. They are relying on future increases in traffic to earn a 
>return on their investment. The provision of bandwidth is getting ever cheaper 
>and nobody sees the the lack of it proving to be a barrier to these companies 
>becoming profitable. It seems to me that there are other factors which make it 
>likely that many of them will never be profitable but that's another story ... 

Right you are, not everybody who invests in markets is
successful. That's why it takes a lot of guts (or
silliness) to try.

>
>
>David
>
>
BTW, my comments on the growth internet capacity were
mainly to suggest that bandwidth, processor capacity,
etc, are non compos mentis and the discussion should be
elsewhere, such as conformance to standards,
interoperability, and so on.  I, for one, like email
just the way it is now - er, but with a few
improvements.





w3

Bill Wood
Las Vegas, NV
wwwood@lv.rmci.net

Support Bilingual Education
 ...  English and Mathematics