Wish List for PMMail

[Alexander Sarras]

On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:20:16, Brian Morrison wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:04:21 +0100 (MEZ), Alexander Sarras wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 09:00:38 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >
> >> Thursday, December 16, 1999, 8:50:09 AM, Cristian wrote:
> >> > What's wrong with that ?
> >> 
> >>     It encourages the bad use of HTML in email.
> >> 
> >> > PMMail treats the problem in a 'clever' way:
> >> > If HTML is off, nothing special.
> >> > If HTML is on, it depends:
> >> > - if the user does a simple writing only - like the present message -,
> >> > normal text is sent, same like HTML were off
> >> > - if the user makes any little intervention to the text style (font
> >> > color, size, whatever), from now on the whole message will be treated
> >> > as HTML
> >> 
> >> > So ?
> >> 
> >> 
> >>     So.  If you reply to an HTML message yet use none of your own the message
> >> still goes out in HTML.  *BAD*
> >> 
> >There's really nothing I can add.
> 
> I don't think that PMMail/2 does this, does it?
> 
Not yet, and I sincerely hope it never will!
SaS
-- 
  Alexander.Sarras@ap.univie.ac.at  |     * Trouble * IS my middle name!
                                    |           The TroubleShooter
------------------------------------------------------------------------