Proper threading? (technical aspects)

[Steve Lamb]

On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 04:07:10PM -0700, Steve Wendt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 21:33:58 +0100, Dr. Martin R. Hadam wrote:
> 
> >couldn't care less. I'd estimate that the count of users applauding my
> >proposed changes outnumbers those disapproving it by a factor of more
> >than 10 (ten).
 
> I would like it to sort as Martin describes as well.  But I'm not going to
> complain... :)

    To be honest, so would I, with priorities working and threading as well.
But I find sorting by received time works quite well for putting new mail up
top and when I want to follow a "thread" I just sort by subject, which still
puts them in cronological order under subject.  *shrug*

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------