IMAP?

[Steve Lamb]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:01:26 -0700, Marty Abrego wrote:

>Seems to me that IMAP's "advantages" are largely irrelevant, given PM
>Mail's "remote control" feature.

    Remote control does not keep state information between two machines, is
rather kludgy, is seperate from the bulk of the program and does not allow
you to have multiple folders.
 
    IMAP, for all intents and purposes, is a completely functional folder
which just happens to reside on a different server.  It is impossible to
duplicate it with POP.

- -- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQA/AwUBN3G+U3pf7K2LbpnFEQKYswCg3Yq/7Pepjz6yUHFno+CkTJkPFdEAnA4c
8AGl5Fy9egmYalt2ojWVlCIM
=ZDDO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----