OT: The Great "Netiquette" Debate
Marty Abrego
pmmail@rpglink.com
Thu, 04 Nov 1999 22:43:17 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 04 Nov 1999 11:12:38 +0000 (GMT), Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
>>Unfortunately, netiquette is about a common as holding a door open for
>>a lady.
>
>Hmmm, you talk about netiquette and then you add about 15-20 or so
>lines of garbage to each of your messages.
Now, now, don't exaggerate.
>Is this supposed to be a sig.? If so, why isn't there a separator
>to denote that and why are you 400% over the accepted limit on the
>length thereof? If it isn't a sig., what relevance has it to the
>topic at hand?
<snipped 13-line sig.>
>I suppose you'll come back with some clever answer, but really this
>just smacks of hypocrisy.
Well, you're half right. When I pushed that "send" button and saw
which sig went out, I literally rolled on the floor laughing --
delicious irony! I usually use a four line sig, but sometimes use
longer sigs when relevent (which obviously wasn't the case here).
Fumble? Yes. Hypocrisy? No. Join me in the laugh -- it really
*was* funny.
\\|//
Marty Abrego (o o) "Anarchy does not imply mayhem."
-------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------------------------------------
photon@qnet.com - Mr. Realtime
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOCJ8hNjySA+MEwdVAQGSwwP9Gs+3fpCzpTwiNWMAITTE3XHMJnRO0XT4
el4Bq/TrR5ZHg+pWwsKGoNPmFo4Wm998jJCJDE1G62YjQNfsVcCz/iEMJICsBOyb
WsbQRdGvms8LunSLkoDSwRkK8VYe7wkqQtMElXcj0crshG5TYe+O7qemUIJLBXDM
kd2G/Js2r98=
=d9/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----