PMmail trap.
Brian Morrison
pmmail@rpglink.com
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:52:10
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 12:26:50 +0100 (CET), Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 01:14:51 -0800 (PST), Steve Wendt wrote:
>
>>>>>SO32DLL.DLL 0002:00006953
>>>>>
>>>>That's a trap in the TCP/IP stack. What's your inetver?
>>>
>>>It's 4.00e
>>
>>4.0 had a so32dll? Hmm, I thought that was only with 4.1 and above. Regardless,
>>I'd recommend you update it, it's been at 4.02w for a while now:
>>ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/ps/products/tcpip/fixes/v4.0os2/latest/stack/
>>tp://service.boulder.ibm.com/ps/products/mpts/fixes/english-us/wr08424_conv/
>
>Thanks, I'll follow your recommendation especially since there are a few
>alarming APARs on SO32DLL.DLL. However, my Warp is UK-English, so I
>thought I better install from the english-uk directory. I hope it's
>correct when I picked wru8610_conv, it was the latest, but I don't know
>if any synchronisation with the tcpip mods is needed. Anyway I have a
>backup of my boot drive so I should be able to get back to square one if
>anything strange occurs :-)
>
Be very careful with wru8610, or indeed wr08610. This is a fix that
installs a 32 bit stack, I have found it to be unreliable in some
circumstances. In addition, if you remove it, things get left behind
that can cause Java 1.1.7 and later to cause a ring 0 trap.
I have stayed with the wr08424 update, after applying wr08423. This is
OK, at least for me. Of course, YMMV.
--
Brian Morrison bdm@fenrir.demon.co.uk
do you know how far this has gone?
just how damaged have I become?
'Even Deeper' by Nine Inch Nails