Bugs & Feature Status in Updates?

[John Angelico]

On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:10:02 -0700 (PDT), Don Morse wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:05:43 +1100 (EDT), John Angelico wrote:
>
>re:>True, but on a screen resolution of 1280x1024 that little window is not the easiest to read, is it?
>re:>
>re:>And it doesn't seem to be resizable.
>
>1280x1024 here and no problem...

Yeah, I can use it alright - don't want to change back to anything less. Just commenting that reading a window 
which is fixed according to a Windoze assumption of 800x600 maximum (I've seen this in a couple of other Win 
apps too) makes for an almost unreadable image when your real screen is 1280x1024.


Best regards
John Angelico
OS/2 SIG
Melbourne PC User Group Inc.
Email: talldad@melbpc.org.au or talldad@kepl.com.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------