Repost - pls help. Pm crashing on PGP signed mail
Steve Marvin
pmmail@dmiyu.org
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:17:28 -0400
Doesn't crash here - PMMail2000 2.10.2010 on WinNT 4.0.
I pasted your attached message into a file in my inbox,
reindexed and the message showed up. Looked at it in
preview pane and then opened it. Showed in status bar
that it was unable to verify the PGP signature but
no problems opening it.
I suggest you upgrade to the current version.
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:31:30 -0600, Larry Alkoff wrote:
>
>This thread which I started has gotten off on a side track discussing cut and paste issues - which have been solved for me.
>
>Can we please discuss how to prevent (some) messages which have a PGP key to the left of the date
>from crashing PMMail when I either preview the msg or open it for reading?
>
>It's a really annoying bug and I don't yet even know if it's unique to my PMMail setup.
>My PMMail is version PMMail 98 Professional 2.00.1500 under Windows 98 SE.
>Sorry, I no longer run OS/2 <sob>.
>
>While one poster suggested I upgrade (presumably to PMMail 2000) I'd prefer not to do that until I know
>it fixes the problem.
>
>Does anyone else have this problem? Is it a known issue? Is it fixed in PMMail 2000?
>Can I do anything about it?
>
>One of the offending messages is attached for your enjoyment and below is the error message
>I get which, when I click OK, closes PMMail.
>
>PMMAILW caused an invalid page fault in
>module <unknown> at 0000:00000001.
>
>Registers:
>EAX=00000000 CS=0167 EIP=00000001 EFLGS=00010206
>EBX=00000000 SS=016f ESP=0070ec30 EBP=00831d84
>ECX=008322d4 DS=016f ESI=008321f4 FS=11a7
>EDX=00000001 ES=016f EDI=00831a44 GS=0000
>Bytes at CS:EIP:
>00 00 00 65 04 70 00 16 00 70 05 65 04 70 00 65
>Stack dump:
>1001f22b 008322d4 00831a44 00832104 00831d84 00000000 1004cc2e
>008321f4 00831a44 0072a248 00831d84 00831d84 1004ce51 00832104
>1003606b 00832104
>
>
>Best, Larry Alkoff N2LA
>
>
>
>
>-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --
>-- File: Re: csh vs bash
>
>Return-Path: <linux-owner-labradley=mindspring.com@ctlug.org>
>Received: from fmp.com ([216.171.14.34])
> by hazard.mail.mindspring.net (Mindspring Mail Service) with SMTP id sv10h0.rig.37kb01i
> for <labradley@mindspring.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:34:23 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: (qmail 19910 invoked by uid 30); 20 Oct 2000 17:28:09 -0000
>Delivered-To: linux@fmp.com
>Received: (qmail 19903 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2000 17:28:08 -0000
>Delivered-To: alias-ctlug-linux@ctlug.org
>Received: (qmail 19896 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2000 17:28:07 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO mail.pillory.com) (qmailr@216.30.103.11)
> by donjon.fmp.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 17:28:07 -0000
>Received: (qmail 12794 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2000 17:27:57 -0000
>From: "Jack McKinney" <jackmc-linux@lorentz.com>
>Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:27:56 -0500
>To: linux@ctlug.org
>Subject: Re: csh vs bash
>Message-ID: <20001020122756.A12785@stocks.pillory.com>
>Mail-Followup-To: linux@ctlug.org
>References: <20001020121757.B19310@donjon.fmp.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
>In-Reply-To: <20001020121757.B19310@donjon.fmp.com>; from fmouse@fmp.com on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:17:57PM -0500
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: "Jack McKinney" <jackmc-linux@lorentz.com>
>
>
>--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Big Brother tells me that Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>> Michael Rice and some folks at the CACTUS meeting last night were discuss=
>ing
>> some inherent problems with csh/tcsh and a document somewhere which point=
>ed
>> these out. Michael, do you, or does anyone else, have a link to a website
>> covering this topic?
>>=20
>
> Boy... I wish I had been able to stay lopnger. I'd have plugged
>zsh big time. It is a MUCH nicer shell than either bash or csh.
> BTW... debian 2.2 does not install csh by default, but it does install
>bash. I had to edit some shell scripts in some distributions (e.g., xv)
>to work around this.
>
>--
>"Restore your inalienable human rights. Jack McKinney
> Vote Libertarian. http://www.lp.org http://www.lorentz.com
> http://www.harrybrowne2000.org jackmc@lorentz.com
> 1024D/D68F2C07 4096g/38AEF076
>
>--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Big Brother tells me that Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>> Michael Rice and some folks at the CACTUS meeting last night were discuss=
>ing
>> some inherent problems with csh/tcsh and a document somewhere which point=
>ed
>> these out. Michael, do you, or does anyone else, have a link to a website
>> covering this topic?
>>=20
>
> Boy... I wish I had been able to stay lopnger. I'd have plugged
>zsh big time. It is a MUCH nicer shell than either bash or csh.
> BTW... debian 2.2 does not install csh by default, but it does install
>bash. I had to edit some shell scripts in some distributions (e.g., xv)
>to work around this.
>
>--
>"Restore your inalienable human rights. Jack McKinney
> Vote Libertarian. http://www.lp.org http://www.lorentz.com
> http://www.harrybrowne2000.org jackmc@lorentz.com
> 1024D/D68F2C07 4096g/38AEF076
>
>--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--
>****
>To unsubscribe from the linux list, send a message containing
>only the word "unsubscribe" to linux-request@fmp.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>