Why this phobia to HTML mail?
Steven Hollar
pmmail@rpglink.com
Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:11:20 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:38:00 -0300, Trevor Smith wrote:
>This is not an argument to accept MS-defined HTML email. This is an
>argument to work harder and faster to make an _official_ RFC (or
>other standard) explaining how text markup in email should work on
>ALL email clients. If it's coming anyway, we should make sure that it
>is clearly and publicly understood exactly what "it" is.
Exactly, all this noise is just like preaching to the choir. If you don't like it, take it up with the folks
that have actually not written to the standards and make them fix it.
I'd personally like to see the HTML crap not put in email. Folks here at work use the Outlook stationary
crap and it practically doubles the size of a 1 sentence email. (and then I have to justify why I need a
bigger harddrive in my laptop).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies.
iQA/AwUBOcZayNAzS98SSQ6EEQKqDQCfZCiobpyH1qLcsyO7KyS5kmtd4dIAn0Ij
vrCW6UT1w01BqlOW/fsGKi4E
=9A9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----