Fwd: Rephrasing the Questions

[Ralph Cohen]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 21:05:37 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:31:09PM -0500, Maynard Riley wrote:
>> still nobody on this list willing to discuss anything of relevance
>
>    Well, let me take a stab.
>
>> >I would appreciate any answers you can provide to the following
>> >questions.
>
>    They cannot provide answers.  What answers they could provide, they have.
>

I disagree.  BSW (Thomas) chooses not to respond.  They could choose to
respond if they wanted to, although we'd probably find that their
responses wouldn't line up with the vague commitments made in the press
release.


>    See, you're making a basic mistake.  The list is more than willing to
>discussion those questions.  That is why Ralph posed them in the first place.
>However, BSW has given us /nothing/ to discuss.  So with nothing relevant to
>discuss, what, exactly, do you expect the list to discuss?  

Exactly!


>    If you have questions about PMMail I could name at least a half dozen
>people off the top of my head that would jump on your message in mere hours of
>it being posted.  In fact, lets see if I can.
>
>    Ralph, Trevor, myself, Jimmy, Jon, and.. and...  Crap, I'm forgetting

Oh sure, like we're really paying attention.<g> Actually, I continue
learn new things about PMMail from this list so I continue to hang
around despite the fact that the pay really sucks.

Ralph
rpcohen@neurotron.com