Java Performance/Python etc

[Simon Bowring]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:53:51 -0400 (EDT), Rodney R. Korte wrote:

>>So in this context "=0" means "virtual" (i.e. that the implementation 
>>of the method/member-function needs to be supplied by derived 
>>classes). Hmmm - obvious!
>
>Tsk, tsk, Simon.  "void myVirtualFunction()=0;" isn't even a 
>valid declaration.

Jeez, it was the "=0" that I was moaning about, but point taken.
Also I said, "Soupstrap wanted to introduce a keyword "virtual" for 
pure virtual member functions, 
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Simon