[pmmail-list] Latest Beta: Filter processing broken??
James L. Vaughn
pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 10:34:45 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001 19:45:29 -0400 (AST), PMMail OS/2 Support wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:57:01 -0700, Mark Paulus wrote:
>
>>anyway, it seems like if the cygwin appears as a second entry
>>in the to: list, then the filter is not reacting correctly.
>>Do I need to re-code the filter to get a "recursive" checking
>>to work, or did something break in the latest beta??
>
>Hmmm... I thought all versions had this bug (couldn't see an address
>in the To: field if it wasn't the first address). You're saying this
>*did* work before?
>
Yes, it works in PMMail/2 v2, v2.1 and later. I use it for spam
filtering. All I have to do, pick something that is common across a
number of spam, in the "h.to" or "h.from" fields, and it deletes all.
My spam filter has about forty or more lines, I still get spam but
about 80% is deleted.
- pmmail-list - The PMMail Dicussion List ---------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to mdaemon@bmtmicro.com with the first
line of the message body being...
UNSUBSCRIBE pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com