[pmmail-list] PMMail mystery process pegs CPU
Carl Gehr
pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
Mon, 03 Sep 2001 19:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Consider me, "Relaxed!"
It was just that the request was based on a comment that strongly
implied that, "...no one should really need to request mail in less
than hour increments..." And, it appeared that this was the second
time you seemed to agree with the request. I have NO problem with
larger values. If someone wants to wait a week, that's their choice...
It was only smaller that was my concern.
Thanks,
Carl
On Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:26:31 -0300, PMMail OS/2 Support wrote:
>On Mon, 03 Sep 2001 18:15:54 -0400 (EDT), Carl Gehr wrote:
>
>>Just to REPEAT!
>> HOURS ARE TOTALLY ****UNACCEPTABLE****
>> _unless_ there is also an _option_ to
>> continue to pick SECONDS or MINUTES.
>>
>> ONE MINUTE is the longest minimum that
>> is acceptable.
>>
>>So, I hope 'when' is 'never' if I take your statement literally.
>>
>>Please _clarify_ what you really mean...
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2001 18:40:21 -0300, PMMail OS/2 Support wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>The max value of "Check For New Mail Every XXX Seconds" be changed to
>>>>hours instead. I find this particular feature of MR/2 Ice to be very
>
>Carl, relax. You have misinterpreted the suggested feature and, in
>turn, misinterpreted my confirmation that we have heard the request.
>
>No one suggested changing the _interval_ from seconds to hours. The
>suggestion was to change the _max value_ to hours.
>
>
>--
>Trevor Smith
- pmmail-list - The PMMail Discussion List ---------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to mdaemon@bmtmicro.com with the first
line of the message body being...
UNSUBSCRIBE pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com