[pmmail-list] Timestamp bug (was) Beta progress

[PMMail 2000 Support]

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:28:05 +1200, Richard Grevers wrote:

>A week or so ago I posted a bug report here about timestamps ending
>in "GMT" being incorrectly handled in recent betas (no time zone
>correction is done). I never saw any response to that.

Yes, we have been working on this one and just located the culprit.
Peter is still working with the code and will continue on tomorrow to
try and get this one fixed.


>On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:33:32 -0400, Ralph Cohen wrote:

>Thanks for the update.  Were you able to replicate the problem with the
>Outbox folder not changing colors using the details I sent you last
>week?

I have not reproduced this one Ralph, has anyone else experienced a
problem with the Outbox not indicating messages inside AFTER you have
sent one message? 

>On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:34:14 -0500, Hazen Woods wrote:

>OK - still have a problem with build 2581 and Win 2K Pro.  Downloaded,
>opened and upon connection build 2581 retrieved the two waiting posts,
>then closed connection

Yes I was able to repeat this problem here today and Peter will be
working on that tomorrow as well, we are making progress. As for the
problem in Win98, we haven't reproduced it here, but it is most likely
related to all other dial-up problems and we are still working to
resolve them all.

>On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:49:01 -0600, Martin Moran wrote:

>I would like to see a full tree view for different threads,
>sorted by whatever will yield the proper chronological order of
>threading - it that's using message id's and references, that's fine. 
>This is probably something that we wouldn't see until v3, though - I'm
>assuming that it would take a bit of work.

Unfortunately, you are right Martin, anything like this will not be
added until v3. I think we can all agree that solving the numerous
other bugs deserve the focus right now. I am just as anxious as
everyone else is to move on to adding features though! We will get
there soon...

>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 01:04:33 -0400, Steve Barber wrote:

>I did find what appears to be a very big leak in the search
>messages for some string function 

This is corrected in 2581, at least I do not experience any such
problems here or on my Win XP machine, the modest 1-3 MB jumps were all
given back immediately after closing the Search window as well.  Peter
said there will still be very minor leaks, but that he has patched and
plugged (in the most professional sense of the terms)  most all of the
major leaks that caused performance problems within PMMail.

>On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 08:49:01 +0200, Sven Schumacher wrote:

>I've heard nothing about printig the attachment-names since I asked the last time. I really want this feature!!! Where are the developers? I like to get an answer 
>from this guys....

Again, I apologize that I do not respond to each and every post on this
list. There simply isn't enough time to post a reply to each feature
request. This is definitly a feature that is lacking in PMMail and we
are doing our best right now to correct bugs before we begin creating
new ones. 


Thank you,
Brandon King, PMMail 2000 Technical Support
support@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
http://www.pmmail2000.com



- pmmail-list - The PMMail Discussion List ---------------------------
To POST to the list, send your message to:
pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to mdaemon@bmtmicro.com 
with the first line of the message body being...
UNSUBSCRIBE pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------