[pmmail-list] Feature Request

[Simon]

In terms of "best busines value" for $ invested 
it seems to me that blueprint would be best looking forward, rather than looking back.
Certainly as a PMMail user now I want to see PMMail continue to be enhanced,
and to do that it has to be saleable - ie there has to be an income stream to support the investment.
Consequently supporting DOS, win3.1, win9x, or even OS/2 (I'm allowed to say this, I was a user for 10 years) don't rate compared to 
new features, convenience, and support for current operating systems, and selling the product.
Bring it on, I still think PMMail is the most usable package available, but does need some work


=On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:43:37 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:

=>What's the point?  Does PMMail actually run on any 8.3-only systems?

=Any file system can be an 8.3 system.  I run multiple OSs and deal with
=many people still running Win3.1 or DOS. We all use only 8.3 filenames.
=If we receive files with LFN we cannot save with the default LFN
=but have to rename before save
- pmmail-list - The PMMail Discussion List ---------------------------
To POST to the list, send your message to:
pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message to mdaemon@bmtmicro.com 
with the first line of the message body being...
UNSUBSCRIBE pmmail-list@blueprintsoftwareworks.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------