Fwd: Rephrasing the Questions

[Steve Lamb]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:51:28AM -0400, Ralph Cohen wrote:
> >    They cannot provide answers.  What answers they could provide, they have.

> I disagree.  BSW (Thomas) chooses not to respond.  They could choose to
> respond if they wanted to, although we'd probably find that their
> responses wouldn't line up with the vague commitments made in the press
> release.

    And who was it talking about context before?  They, of course, was in
reference to your message which was addressed to Jimmy and Trevor.  That was
further reinforced by the later paragraph which you cut that said "Neither is
subscribed or have given the answers or authorization to release those answers
to Jimmy or Trevor."

    You will note the answers provided by Jimmy and Trevor do line up with the
releases.

> >    Ralph, Trevor, myself, Jimmy, Jon, and.. and...  Crap, I'm forgetting
 
> Oh sure, like we're really paying attention.<g> Actually, I continue
> learn new things about PMMail from this list so I continue to hang
> around despite the fact that the pay really sucks.

    Heh.  Shush, you or I withhold your peanut.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------