PGP problems with PMMail 2000 Pro

[Steve Lamb]

On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 10:24:06PM -0500, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> Funny, I tell people something similar.  If they don't conform to the 
> standard PGP 2.62, go away.  I won't change to a less secure system 
> until a new standard is established and verified by knowledgeable 
> professionals.

1: You cannot claim it is less secure.
2: 2.6.x is not a standard no matter what your dillusions might be.
3: GPG does conform, is open source, is peer reviewed, does 5.x as well as the
2.6.x.

    You have no excuses.  Discussion over.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------