On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:02:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: >1: You cannot claim it is less secure. >2: 2.6.x is not a standard no matter what your dillusions might be. >3: GPG does conform, is open source, is peer reviewed, does 5.x as well as the >2.6.x. > > You have no excuses. Discussion over Is GPG available for OS/2 yet? I haven't seen it... John (john.thompson@attglobal.net)