IMAP?

[Steve Lamb]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:05:56 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:

>Yes, I realise that the two are intended for different circumstances, I
>was wondering why a company would change over if the circumstances did
>not change.

    Plans for the future.  Ignorance on the part of management.

>I wonder if BoB and Ike will add IMAP support? Perhaps in version 3?

    They have stated, several times, that they plan on it in v3.  That is
partially why I'm pushing for people to accept the current revision as it is
and let them get to work on the next generation of the product.

- -- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQA/AwUBN3ELqXpf7K2LbpnFEQLEjwCfczFaiIpz3FNeflKK+PSqajjH118An0uh
WJILWrfRUa28Sgodgx6PPCwA
=B6jo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----