Another New Feature Request
Business Intelligence Customer Service
pmmail@rpglink.com
Tue, 09 Nov 1999 14:16:13 -0500
Careful Mr. Wood, if you make Mr. Lamb unhappy he'll take his
list and we will be without again . . .
He has comments on most 'any' post.
On Tue, 09 Nov 1999 10:46:27 -0800 (PST), Bill Wood wrote:
>Mr Lamb, I don't think I am interested in discussing
>any topic with you any further.
>
>w3
>
>On Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:38:24 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
>>Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 10:14:40 AM, Bill wrote:
>>> invisible. It cannot, for example, depend on everyone
>>> following some obscure 'netiquette'.
>>
>> I'd prefer that more people understood proper netiquette. "Obscure" is
>>not the correct word. It is as relevant today as it was yesterday and the day
>>before. The problem is that newer software encourages the user to ignore
>>proper netiquette.
>>
>> Of course, I expect such an argument from someone who doesn't adhere
>>proper netiquette. Instead of changing his behavior to the benefit of
>>everyone else he wants everyone else to change their behavior to the benefit
>>of him.
>>
>> Sorry, doesn't work that way. That is why people don't want to discuss
>>it. You'd think over the past 20 years that people have been using networks
>>and that proper netiquette has worked for all that time that people have
>>discussed it. They've discussed it quite a lot, in fact. A lot of them who
>>have been adhering to it for years and have discussed it for years just are
>>not willing to get into one more discussion with one more clueless newbie
>>(that's you, Bill) who wants the entire network to change to his ignorant
>>views to appease him.
>>
>>--
>> Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
>> ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
>>-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>w3
>
>Bill Wood
>Las Vegas, NV
>wwwood@lv.rmci.net
>
>Support Bilingual Education
> ... English and Mathematics
>
>
>