Rude, rude, rude!

[Carl S. Hayes]

The word should have been "would not" change, sorry
about that!

Carl

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:51:05 -0500, Carl S. Hayes wrote:

>I seldom reply to much . . . however this time I must.
>
>I agree with Brian . . . if it's a $$s issue, then say so or just
>get info out to those who have spent $$s over the years.
>
>I guess when you find 'die hard' OS/2 users I can only guess
>that some software vendors feel that we will take what they
>offer, when they offer it.  As for me, PMMail works just fine now.
>While I would welcome some changes/improvements, I would
>change because they haven't provided information.
>
>Carl
>
>On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:38:36 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:25:22 -0700 (PDT), Don Morse wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 07:26:00 -0700 (PDT), Bill Wood wrote:
>>>
>>>re:>We should have the goodness to sit down, shut up, and wait for
>>>re:>the deadline before bitching and whining. We probably won't
>>>re:>like it, but let's wait and see what the man has to say.
>>>
>>>I agree, instead of pissing off one of the few OS/2 s/w vendors left.  childish.
>>
>>Don, I've parted with quite a bit of cash supporting OS/2 s/w vendors,
>>and as you say few are now left. Does that mean that I have to be
>>grateful for the scraps from the table? If BSW say "we will do PMMail
>>version 3 but we need some money from customers up front" I will be the
>>first in the queue. But having paid the money, I would then want the
>>promise to be honoured.
>>
>>-- 
>>Brian Morrison                                  bdm@fenrir.demon.co.uk
>>              do you know how far this has gone?
>>               just how damaged have I become?
>>                                      'Even Deeper' by Nine Inch Nails