Rude, rude, rude!

[Brian Morrison]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:24:32 -0300, Trevor Smith wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:02:35 -0400 (EDT), Ralph Cohen wrote:
>
>>Why am I not surprised at the lack of any response from the BSW reps to
>>my simple question?  It seems to be the pattern with this company's
>>reps that whenever they are asked a question they don't want to answer,
>>they just ignore it.  Even a simple "Hey, I see your question but I
>
>I don't know the answer to your question. That's why I didn't answer
>it.
>
>I don't always read every word of every message on this list (this is
>a voluntary effort, at least on my part). Possibly Jimmy also can't
>read every message and didn't see your question. (Just a guess.)

Trevor, did you ever get my message about the PGP vulnerability that
came to light earlier in the week? When I sent it (from my work) I got
repeated failures from the server saying that it could not resolve
haligonian.com.

If you didn't, please note that the PGP SDK used for PMMail 2000 Pro
may have the unsigned ADK vulnerability that first appeared in v5.5. I
believe that NAI have a patch or updated SDK to fix this, so it would
be a very good idea for BSW to release a fixed version of PMMail 2000
Pro. The OS/2 PGP port is not at risk as it does not contain the same
code.


- -- 

Brian Morrison                                  bdm@fenrir.org.uk

 "Almost noon, and she had yet to go the launderette in Concreton to 
 thaw out chickens in the spin-drier..."

PGP Public Key Fingerprint= C7 12 B9 54 00 0F 51 F6  37 9B 18 D1 E1 61 14 0B

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: This comment _is_ plain text
Charset: cp850

iQA/AwUBOa39n/QTY1HeMuXFEQIWVACdHM6Fd5l0wXgiA/9OOwoyTtX5Uv4AnRQT
mvwWaEwph+HBkCHFRgyL1PeM
=P2/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----